Legal Opinion

Kamau v. Ertifai

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 14, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02863Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 John Kamau, No. CV-25-02863-PHX-SHD 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Hamid R Ertifai, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff John Kamau’s application to proceed in forma 16 pauperis (“IFP”), (Doc. 2), and emergency motion for a temporary restraining order 17 (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction (“PI”), (Doc. 7). For the reasons explained below, 18 Kamau’s application to proceed IFP is denied, Kamau’s Complaint is dismissed without 19 prejudice, and the motion for TRO and PI is dismissed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Diana Houck v. Substitute Trustee ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. Marilyn Scott and John Scott v. Don Breeland and the Oak Ridge Boys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Wolfe v. StrankmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API