Legal Opinion

The Nettie Sundberg

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 30, 1900No. 11,898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the Court

DE HA YEN, District Judge.

Libel for damages sustained by the scow schooner Mabel and Edith, as the result of having been collided with by the schooner Ne'ttie Sundberg, the libel alleging that such collision was caused by the negligent and improper navigation of the latter vessel. At the tipie of the collision the Mabel and Edith was *887moored alongside the eud of Folsom Street pier in the harbor of San Francisco. She had been in this posilion for about two hours, awaiting an opportunity to haul in by the side of (he United States transport Sherman, on the north side of the pier, for the purpose…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Clarita and the ClaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Cushing v. Owners of the Ship John FraserSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  3. Board of Harbor Commissioners v. Excelsior Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  4. The MilliganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1882
  5. Green v. Steamer HelenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co. v. King Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  2. Ross v. Cornell Steamboat Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1906
  3. Haho v. NorthwesternDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API