Legal Opinion
Seattle Audubon Society v. Moseley
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 17, 1992No. C92-479WDPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL
DWYER, District Judge.
Defendants James R. Moseley, et al. (“Forest Service”) and defendants-interve-nors Washington Contract Loggers Association, et al. (“WCLA”) have filed notices of appeal from the Memorandum Decision and Injunction of July 2, 1992 (“July 2 decision”) (Dkt. # 181), and from the Order on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, etc. (“May 28 order”) (Dkt. # 138). The Forest Service and WCLA now move for a stay of the injunction pending appeal. Plaintiffs Seattle Audubon Society, et al. (“SAS”) oppose a stay. All materials filed in support…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Mark Abramowitz v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Seattle Audubon Society v. EvansDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Seattle Audubon Society v. LyonsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
- Sierra Club v. EspyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
- Swan View Coalition v. WeberDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2014