National Zinc Company v. Van Gunda
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
The sole question to be determined is whether employer furnished claimant medical treatment in December, 1963, to toll the Statute of Limitations, where the claimant did not file his claim for compensation for an injury sustained on February 9, 1963, until March 4, 1964.
The parties will be hereinafter referred to as they appeared before the State Industrial Court: Marvin Douglas Van Gunda, claimant, National' Zinc Co., Inc., employer, and Hartford Accident' and Indemnity Company, as insurance carrier.
The parties stipulated before the trial judge as to all the jurisdictional…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Brick & Tile Company v. RoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Cupit v. Dancu Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Determan v. Wilson and CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Fullhart Maytag Company v. StapletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Shank v. Oklahoma Office & Bank Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
3Cited by10 opinions
- Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Purdy v. Flint Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Special Indemnity Fund v. HulseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Guy James Construction Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Dismang v. Slagle ManufacturingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.