Legal Opinion
California v. United States Department of Labor
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 30, 2014No. Civ. No. 2:13-cv-2069 KJM DADPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1128ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
This case considers the intersection between a state’s interest in public pension reform and provisions of the Urban Mass Transportation Act (UMTA) requiring •state transit to ensure the preservation and continuation of collective bargaining rights as a condition of receiving federal funding for mass transit projects.
The case was before the court on September 30, 2014 for hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, ECF No. 9, plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No. 54, and defendant’s subsequent motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- California v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- State v. U.S. the Dep't of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Auth., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Amalgamated Transit Union Int'l v. U.S. Dept. of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Amalgamated Transit Union Int'l v. U.S. Dept. of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021