Legal Opinion

State v. U.S. the Dep't of Labor

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 24, 2018No. 2:13–cv–02069–KJM–DBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimberly J. Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The State of California ("State") has sought a federal grant for two state transit projects. The United States Department of Labor ("DOL") has refused to certify the State to receive the grant funds. The State argues this refusal of certification was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"). Although the court previously resolved the parties' cross motions for summary judgment, largely in the State's favor, one question remains: Whether DOL can properly base *1182its refusal to certify the State to receive grant funds…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPASupreme Court of the United States · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO, Local 697 v. Toledo Area Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Amalgamated Transit Union Int'l v. U.S. Dept. of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. United States Department Of Justice v. State of NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API