Cummings v. United States Postal Service
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MARY F. CUMMINGS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-18-231-RAW ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE , ) ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the court is the motion of the defendant for summary judgment. Plaintiff (proceeding pro se) alleges she was employed by the defendant until discharged on July 25, 2016. She brings fourteen claims against the defendant, arising out of the discharge and subsequent efforts at employment on her part. Summary judgment is appropriate only when “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Schneider v. City of Grand Junction Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Andrews v. HeatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Port City Properties v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.