Legal Opinion

Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper Pike

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1983No. 45177PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.

In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff-landowner asserted that defendant-city prevented plaintiffs intended use of the subject property by invalid zoning revaluation. The trial court conducted a trial and dismissed plaintiffs case at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. This court reversed that ruling and remanded the case for further proceedings. Thereafter, the city rezoned the property in a manner that still prohibited plaintiffs proposed use, and then moved to dismiss the case as moot. Plaintiff responded with a motion to amend its complaint, in order to assert that the new zoning…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Culver v. City of WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Ex parte SteeleDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1908
  4. Union Oil Co. v. City of WorthingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Davies v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wagner v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Cent. Motors Corp. v. Pepper PikeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. WineOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Kline v. Newton FallsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Turner v. Cleveland City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API