Legal Opinion
Anton v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 30, 2002No. CIV. 01-40064PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court are the parties 1 cross-motions for summary judgment. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), the Court will determine these motions without a hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court shall deny Plaintiffs motion [docket entry 15] and grant Defendant’s motion [docket entry 14].
I. BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are largely undisputed. Plaintiff Mushtag Anton is the former owner and operator of Grandy Market, a retail food market located in Detroit, Michigan. Defendant is the United States. Grandy Market was a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dasmesh Enterprises., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
- Huggins v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2012
- Corner Market v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020
- Sana Energy Management, Inc. v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021