Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wilson v. Sunderland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2000No. 99-1720PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Wilson asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ. For the following reasons, Wilson’s assertions lack merit.

To the extent that Wilson requested that Judge Sunderland rule on his motion for a free transcript, his claim was rendered moot when Judge Sunderland subsequently denied the motion. Mandamus will not issue to compel an act that *549has already been performed. State ex rel. Jones v. O’Connor (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 426, 426, 704 N.E.2d 1223, 1224.

In addition, although Wilson claimed he needed a copy of the transcript to help him prepare an appeal in the court of appeals, that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Newton v. Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Jones v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Murr v. ThierryOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Call v. ZimmersOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. City of Oregon v. DansackOhio Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Portage Lakes Edn. Assn., OEA/NEA v. State Emp. Relations Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. FuerstOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Howard v. SkowOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Blandin v. BeckOhio Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API