Legal Opinion
Marshall & Co., Inc. v. Duke
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided July 26, 1995No. 1:94-cv-03494PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARNES, District Judge.
This case is presently before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award [1] and defendants’ Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award [2]. The Court has reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties and, for the reasons set out below, concludes that plaintiffs’ motion should be granted and that defendants’ motion should be denied.
BACKGROUND
Defendants brought claims against plaintiffs with the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) in 1990 and 1991. Defendants’ claims included alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scott v. Prudential Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. NL IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Marshall & Co., Inc. v. DukeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Core FundDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
- Scott v. Prudential SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.