Legal Opinion
Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Core Fund
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 11, 2012No. Case No. 8:11-cv-2469-T-23TBMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.
The Core Fund (the Fund) and Morgan Stanley mutually submitted their securities dispute to arbitration. Appended to, and incorporated into, the parties’ “Submission Agreement” is the initial arbitration pleading of each party. The “standard form” FINRA submission agreement stipulates that the parties submit to the jurisdiction of the arbitration panel the issues that appear in the claimant’s statement of claim and in the respondent’s answer and defenses. The Fund’s statement of claim includes an express demand for an award of attorneys’ fees from the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Turnberry Associates v. SERVICE STATIONSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gower v. Turquoise Properties Gulf, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- J. Don Gordon Construction, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015