Hansen v. Cramer

I concur in the judgment. I think, however, that the concluding paragraph of the majority opinion is too broad in the light of any evidence I have been able to find in the record. That paragraph says: “From the evidence before the trial court, it would appear that defendant Carole Cramer did not receive ‘fair consideration’ for her conveyance and since she was thereby rendered insolvent, the conveyance- was void as against plaintiff.”

This is an action to set aside a conveyance allegedly executed to defraud plaintiff, a judgment creditor of defendant Carole Cramer. The judgment held by…