Legal Opinion

Automobile Securities Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1928No. Appeal, 64PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Simpson,

Defendant appeals from a decree requiring Mm to account, in a suit brought by the Automobile Securities Company to the use of certain banks. By agreement of the litigants, only the findings of fact have been printed for our use, it being stipulated, however, “that both parties may include in their briefs excerpts from the [more than 2,000 pages of] testimony.” Each has printed such excerpts, but, since we have no means of knowing whether or not the statements therein are in fact true, they cannot add to or subtract from the findings.

Treating the fact that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Porter v. HealySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Glenn v. Kittanning Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Howes v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Tenth National Bank v. Smith Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Guaranty Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union of Russian Societies of St. Michael & St. George, Inc. v. KossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Horner v. HoukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Scranton Axle & Spring Co. v. Scranton Board of TradeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Curtis v. MankusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Automobiles Securities Co. Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Guaranty Corp. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API