Automobiles Securities Co. Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Guaranty Corp. v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
When this case was here before, we affirmed the decree ordering an accounting: Automobile Securities Co., to use, v. Wilson, 293 Pa. 143. Both the legal and use- plaintiffs were then, and, so far as the record discloses, are still represented by the same counsel. After an account had been filed, the legal plaintiff and one of its creditors called on counsel of record for plaintiffs and alleged that the interests of the two classes were antagonistic, but no other appearance was entered of record, nor, so far as appears, was notice of this alleged antagonism given to defendant or to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wolf v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- McCloskey v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Rubinsky v. Kosh, GuardianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Automobile Securities Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vetter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932