Legal Opinion

Automobiles Securities Co. Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Guaranty Corp. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1930No. Appeals, 215 and 216PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

When this case was here before, we affirmed the decree ordering an accounting: Automobile Securities Co., to use, v. Wilson, 293 Pa. 143. Both the legal and use- plaintiffs were then, and, so far as the record discloses, are still represented by the same counsel. After an account had been filed, the legal plaintiff and one of its creditors called on counsel of record for plaintiffs and alleged that the interests of the two classes were antagonistic, but no other appearance was entered of record, nor, so far as appears, was notice of this alleged antagonism given to defendant or to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. McCloskey v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Rubinsky v. Kosh, GuardianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Automobile Securities Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vetter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API