Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. Hauck
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Grant Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.
The appellant has assigned numerous *368errors, but we shall notice such only as are discussed in the supersedeas brief of counsel, which is the only one filed by them.
The action was brought to recover damages for a personal injury sustained by the appellee through the alleged negligence of the appellant while appellee was loading some household goods to be carried upon a freight car set apart to the appellee for that purpose by the agents of the appellant. It is claimed, in argument, on behalf of appellant, that the special verdict of the jury, when purged of mere evidentiary facts and legal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Railroad Company v. HanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Campbell v. Portland Sugar Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873
- Newson v. . the N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. GrushIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hopkins v. BoydIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Rink v. LowryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Hadley v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WelchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.