Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Welch
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Jennings Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J. —
The first question to be determined in this case is whether appellant is entitled to a new trial on account of the misconduct of appellee on the trial in the court below, which resulted in a verdict in his favor.
It appears that on the 20th day of March, 1894, appellee made an arrangement with the proprietor of a hotel in Vernon to furnish meals during the trial to himself and his witnesses at a reduced rate; that on the morning of the 26th of March appellee and his witnesses arrived at Vernon at 8 o’clock, and appellee procured and paid for thirteen tickets for dinner, and appellee…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Pettibone v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
- Bedford, Springville, Owensburg & Bloomfield Railroad v. RainboltIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Houk v. BransonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. German InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Helton v. MannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Tien v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Wahl v. ShouldersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.