Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Welch

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1895No. 1,460PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Jennings Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J. —

The first question to be determined in this case is whether appellant is entitled to a new trial on account of the misconduct of appellee on the trial in the court below, which resulted in a verdict in his favor.

It appears that on the 20th day of March, 1894, appellee made an arrangement with the proprietor of a hotel in Vernon to furnish meals during the trial to himself and his witnesses at a reduced rate; that on the morning of the 26th of March appellee and his witnesses arrived at Vernon at 8 o’clock, and appellee procured and paid for thirteen tickets for dinner, and appellee…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Pettibone v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
  4. Bedford, Springville, Owensburg & Bloomfield Railroad v. RainboltIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Houk v. BransonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. German InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Helton v. MannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Tien v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Wahl v. ShouldersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API