Legal Opinion

Zawadzki v. Vandetti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed on the law in so far as it relates to the -motion separately to state and number the causes of action and motion granted in that respect, and otherwise affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.- Memorandum: Tested *933by rules by which the number of causes of action alleged in a complaint may be determined, we believe that plaintiff’s pleading alleges more than one cause of action, each of which should be separately stated and numbered. (Payne v. N. Y., S. & W. R. R. Co., 201 N. Y. 436, 440; Raftery v. Carter, 162 App. Div. 17, 20.) We recognize in the complaint a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Payne v. . N.Y., S. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Raftery v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Bayside Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Easley v. NealNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Kaufman v. Rosenbach, New York County Courts1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API