Legal Opinion
Neal v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 20, 1970No. 42390PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
In the action below plaintiffs sought damages for an abuse of legal process arising from an attempt to enforce the provisions of an illegal and void contract. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the evidence and plaintiffs appeal.
Plaintiffs were former employees of the defendant under a contract of employment which provided in pertinent part as follows :
“After the termination of the Agreement, Supervisor agrees for the period of one year from the date of such termination he will not, in the territory where Supervisor represented Company, directly or indirectly, represent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holden v. LynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- E. S. Miller Laboratories, Inc. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Central Oil Drilling Co., Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Rance v. SPERRY AND HUTCHINSON COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991