Legal Opinion

Sill v. Sill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from Marion District Court. Action by Rebecca Sill, widow of Daniel Sill, against Samuel M. Sill and others, to have her late husband’s will set aside and declared void as to her. Trial at the May Term, 1882, and finding and judgment for plaintiff. The defendants bring this judgment here for review. The .opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hokton, C. J.:

This was an action brought by Rebecca Sill, widow of Daniel Sill, deceased, to have the will of her late husband set aside and declared void as to her, for the reason, as she alleged, that she never consented in writing or otherwise to the will, and never made any election under the statute to take thereunder. The case was tried by the court, a jury being waived. The court found generally for the plaintiff below, and rendered judgment in her favor. The plaintiffs in error, who are the executors and legatees under the will, complain of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Irwin v. PaulettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Reville v. DubachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Garden v. HainesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Larned v. LarnedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Jack v. HookerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Weisner v. WeisnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API