Legal Opinion

Indiana Central Railway Co. v. Oakes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Hancock, Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Henrietta and Mary Oakes being minors, by Morris Pierson, their guardian and next friend, sued the Railway Company in trespass. The complaint consists of two counts. The first alleges that the plaintiffs were the owners and in the possession of a certain half-quarter section of land in Hancock county, and that the Company, which was the defendant, on the 1st of January 1853, and on divers other days, &c., entered upon said land, and took therefrom 25000 yards of gravel, worth 1250 dollars, and converted the same to her own use, &c. By the second count it is alleged that the defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New-Albany & Salem Railroad v. ConnellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Kimble v. White Water Valley Canal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1849
  3. President & Directors of Crawfordsville & Wabash Railroad v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Dubuque v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  2. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Indianapolis & Madison Railroad v. SolomonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Sweet v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API