Kolkman v. Greens Creek Mining Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice Pro Tern.
I. INTRODUCTION
Robert Kolkman challenges a decision of the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) denying him benefits. The Board found that he failed to give timely notice of his injury and failed to meet the requirements for an exception to the notice requirement. The superior court affirmed. Because we conclude that Kolkman met the requirements for an exception to the notice requirement, 1 we reverse the superior court’s affirmance of the Board’s decision and remand for the Board to determine the com-pensability of Kolkman’s injury.
II. FACTS AND…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Weaver Bros., Inc. v. ChappelAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Yahara v. Construction & Rigging, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wollaston v. Schroeder Cutting, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Dafermo v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Aleck v. Delvo Plastics, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Cogger v. Anchor HouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Wollaston v. Schroeder Cutting, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002