Legal Opinion

Kolkman v. Greens Creek Mining Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1997No. S-6675PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice Pro Tern.

I. INTRODUCTION

Robert Kolkman challenges a decision of the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) denying him benefits. The Board found that he failed to give timely notice of his injury and failed to meet the requirements for an exception to the notice requirement. The superior court affirmed. Because we conclude that Kolkman met the requirements for an exception to the notice requirement, 1 we reverse the superior court’s affirmance of the Board’s decision and remand for the Board to determine the com-pensability of Kolkman’s injury.

II. FACTS AND…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Weaver Bros., Inc. v. ChappelAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Yahara v. Construction & Rigging, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wollaston v. Schroeder Cutting, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dafermo v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Aleck v. Delvo Plastics, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cogger v. Anchor HouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wollaston v. Schroeder Cutting, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API