Legal Opinion

Dafermo v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1997No. S-6864, S-7003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Michael Dafermo filed a workers’ compensation claim for vision problems caused by his computer work. The Board found his claim to be untimely and the superior court affirmed. We reverse.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts

Michael Dafermo worked for the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) from February 1985 to May 1986 as a computer technical operator. He began to experience eye pain, blurred vision, and eye-focusing difficulties while working for MOA. He spoke with two of his supervisors, Al Korz and Keith Stout, about these problems. Korz recommended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. GomesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Morrison-Knudsen Company v. VereenAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. W. R. Grasle Co. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Alaska State Housing Authority v. SullivanAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGAHUEY v. WHITESTONE LOGGING, INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Collins v. Arctic Builders, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Aleck v. Delvo Plastics, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API