Legal Opinion

Richard E. Landau, Cross-Appellee v. J. D. Barter Construction Company, Inc., Cross

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 21, 1981No. 80-2504, 80-2572PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from two orders granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, J.D. Barter Construction Co., Sangamo Construction Co., and Sam Barter. The first order, involved an action brought by plaintiff Richard E. Landau for infringement of a patent on a “sand drain” process, and determined that the patent was invalid. The order cited no reasons for granting the motion. The district court docket sheet shows merely that the summary judgment motion was granted on the basis of 35 U.S.C. § 102 (1979) (lack of novelty) 1 and 35 U.S.C. § 103 (1979) (obviousness). 2…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust Actions. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  5. Kearney & Trecker Corporation v. Giddings & Lewis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Respect Inc. v. Committee on the Status of WomenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  3. Cmi Corporation v. Barber-Greene CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Brandt, Inc. v. CraneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  5. AM International, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API