Legal Opinion

AM International, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 1, 1983No. 80 C 4016PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DECKER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, AM International, Inc. (“AMI”), brought this action against Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”), alleging that the Ektraprint Copier-Duplicator machines manufactured, used and sold by Kodak infringe four U.S. Patents owned by AMI. These four patents are No. 3,838,921 (“Sargis”); No. 3,598,580 (“Baltazzi”); No. 3,606,532 (“Shelffo”); and No. 3,476,382 (“Tregay”).1 In its answer to the complaint, Kodak denied all material allegations and raised various affirmative defenses, including questions of the patents’ invalidity and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust Actions. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Sears PlcDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API