Lebahn v. Owens
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McHUGH, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Trent Lebahn sued Eloise Owens, a consultant for Mr. Lebahn’s employee pension plan, for negligently misrepresenting the amount of his monthly retirement benefits. The district court dismissed Mr. Lebahn’s negligent-misrepresentation claim, concluding it was preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Mr. Le-bahn then filed an untimely Rule 59 motion, arguing preemption did not apply because Ms. Owens was not a fiduciary of the pension plan. The district court construed the untimely motion as one under Rule 60(b) and denied relief, reasoning…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foote v. SpiegelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Johnson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Lebahn v. National Farmers Union Uniform Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Inland Concrete Enterprises, Inc. v. KraftDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Rowland v. MatevousianCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Kellogg v. Watts GuerraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.