Legal Opinion
State v. Ruiz
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 1988No. 17104PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Following a weekend big-game hunting trip with two companions in central Idaho, Freddy Ruiz was charged with four violations of Idaho’s Fish and Game laws and regulations. The alleged offenses — all misdemeanors — were (1) discharging a firearm across a highway; (2) killing a deer after having previously killed another deer during the same hunting season; (3) killing a doe mule deer in an area not open for hunting such an animal; and (4) wasting a game animal by failing to care for the meat. A jury found Ruiz not guilty of the first three charges, but found him guilty of *13t…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. DeckerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. AragonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MacKIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. BoltonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. PayneIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. PurdieIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.