Legal Opinion

Oleszczuk v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1979No. 14456PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants Raymond J. Oleszczuk and Micheline J. Oleszczuk appeal from an order granting defendants’-appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

We must answer only one question on appeal: Did the State Motor Vehicle Department breach a duty to the plaintiffs when they issued a driver’s license to a person with a known history of psycho-motor seizures?

The facts as set forth in the complaint and necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows. Prior to 1974,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Massengill v. Yuma CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fowler v. RobertsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Cansler v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Turner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Stewart v. SchmiederSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API