Legal Opinion

Daigneau v. Young

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1957No. Docket 47, Calendar 47,337PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a directed verdict of no cause for action in his suit for damages resulting from injuries caused by allegedly being struck by defendant’s truck. We view the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Pomeroy v. Dykema, 256 Mich 100.

Plaintiff was engaged in driving a truck, hauling sand from a sand pit located in an open field. He stopped his truck, headed east, in front and east of a power shovel which picked up and loaded sand onto the trucks. Having placed his truck thus for loading, he got out of its left or north side, closed the door, walked northwesterly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Frye v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Michigan Aero Club v. ShelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Warwick v. BlackneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Elsey v. J. L. Hudson Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Elbert v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Karbel v. Comerica BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Goldsmith v. CodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API