Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 2, 2011No. 1233, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES E. MOYLAN, JR.

(Retired, Specially Assigned), J.

Where was the interception? In football, a quarterback, standing on his own ten-yard line, may direct a pass to his wide receiver on the forty-yard line. An intervening defensive back, however, with probable cause to anticipate the pass, may leap up and pull the ball out of the air at the thirty-yard line. In the binary “either-or” world of football, the interception precludes the reception. In the multi-layered world of electronic surveillance, by contrast, the message may be received at its destination even as it is simultaneously…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. In re Darryl P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. 110OAG40, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API