Legal Opinion

In re Darryl P.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 25, 2013No. 2942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

This appeal raises a single contention. An analysis of that contention, however, implicates enough issues to justify a semester of law school. It is, in a phrase, Hydra-headed. The opinion turns out to be a study of differences. There is a potentially critical difference between an unlawful arrest and an unconstitutional arrest. There is a difference between a federal violation and a state violation. Even at the state level, *120there is a significant difference between a constitutional violation and a sub-constitutional violation. An analysis of these differences is necessary to identify the…

2Cases cited103 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. David Hooper Climer, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Madrid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. State v. RivasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Del Marr v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API