Legal Opinion
Dillinger v. North Sterling Irrigation District
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 18, 1957No. 17981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss
Following our decision in Dillinger, et al. v. North Sterling Irrigation District, 129 Colo. 17, 266 P. (2d) 776, the District commenced an action to condemn the fourteen acres of land referred to in that case as the “registered land.”
No answer was filed in the present case by plaintiffs in error. Trial was had to a jury. Under proper instructions, not objected to, but expressly approved by counsel for plaintiff in error, the jury returned its verdict embracing three items: (1) “The value of the land actually taken is $1,326.60”; (2) “The damages, if any, to the residue of the farm is $NONE”;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Searl v. School Dist. No. 2 in Lake Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Board of Commissioners v. NobleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- McGovern v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Union Exploration Co. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Williams v. HankinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Minto v. LambertColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Sinclair Transportation Co. v. SandbergColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- E-470 Public Highway Authority v. Argus Real Estate Partners, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002