Legal Opinion

Williams v. Hankins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 15, 1926No. 11,288PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The county court allowed a claim of defendant in error against the estate of Benjamin M. Williams, deceased, and the administratrix brings error.

The essential facts are that Williams executed a will, afterwards married the plaintiff in error, was then adjudged insane and the defendant in error was appointed as his conservator. The wife brought suit against the conservator to enforce an ante-nuptial contract that for $15,000 to be paid to her she should claim nothing upon his death, and his estate should devolve as per his will, notwithstanding the marriage. The district court sustained her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Searl v. School Dist. No. 2 in Lake Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  3. State v. West Branch Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Williams v. HankinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Sterling National Bank v. FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. RolfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  2. Hursh v. TheisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Sauls v. ESTATE OF NORMA F. AVANTCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. In Re Estate of HealySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API