Legal Opinion

United States v. City of Moline

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 3, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Law. On motion to quash information. Information against the city of Moline for obstructing a navigable water way.

1Opinion of the Court

GROSSCUP, District Judge.

The information, read in connection with the plans for the building of the Illinois & 'Mississippi Canal, shows that it is the purpose of the United states to construct a canal from the Illinois river, at or near the town of Hennepin, to the Mississippi river, at or above the mouth of Rock river, together with the necessary feeders thereto; that at Milan, about five or six miles below what is known as the “Moline Bridge,” to a point about five or six miles above this bridge, the proposed canal is to follow the bed of and use Eock river as a part thereof; that Iiock…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. United States v. Keokuk & H. Bridge Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1891
  4. United States v. RiderDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dastervignes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  2. United States v. MatthewsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1906
  3. North Bloomfield Gravel Min. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  4. E. A. Chatfield Co. v. City of New HavenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1901
  5. Portland v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API