United States v. City of Moline
District Court, N.D. Illinois
At Law. On motion to quash information. Information against the city of Moline for obstructing a navigable water way.
1Opinion of the Court
GROSSCUP, District Judge.
The information, read in connection with the plans for the building of the Illinois & 'Mississippi Canal, shows that it is the purpose of the United states to construct a canal from the Illinois river, at or near the town of Hennepin, to the Mississippi river, at or above the mouth of Rock river, together with the necessary feeders thereto; that at Milan, about five or six miles below what is known as the “Moline Bridge,” to a point about five or six miles above this bridge, the proposed canal is to follow the bed of and use Eock river as a part thereof; that Iiock…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. Keokuk & H. Bridge Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1891
- United States v. RiderDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dastervignes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- United States v. MatthewsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1906
- North Bloomfield Gravel Min. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- E. A. Chatfield Co. v. City of New HavenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1901
- Portland v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.