Legal Opinion

Jassek v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2013No. 20110225PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Michael Jassek appealed from a district court judgment affirming the binding dispute resolution decision of Workforce . Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) that denied payment for a myoelectric prosthesis. We conclude the district court did not have subject matter jurisdiction, and.we therefore vacate the judgment.

I

[¶ 2] Jassek sustained a serious work-related injury resulting in amputation of his left hand above the wrist. Jassek filed an application for workers compensation benefits, and WSI accepted the claim and paid benefits. WSI approved purchase of a hook-style…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Brummund v. BrummundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Estate of HollingsworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hollingsworth v. HollingsworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Carlson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. VaagenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. ConryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. ConryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Interest of WedmoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API