Legal Opinion

Neal v. Sem Ray, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 11, 2011No. 2091068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Judge.

Tina Neal, the plaintiff below, appeals from a partial summary judgment in favor of Sem Ray, Inc. (“Sem Ray”), and Ronder Stringer, two of the defendants below, with respect to Neal’s claim of negligence in the operation of a dump truck. We affirm.

The following facts are undisputed. Stringer and Neal are cousins. Stringer is employed by Sem Ray as a dump-truck driver. On July 21, 2008, Stringer telephoned Neal’s mother and asked her to ride with Stringer on a trip to deliver a load of gravel to a job site in Atmore; however, Neal’s mother could not ride with Stringer due to a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Boshell v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Williams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Absolute Drug Detection Services, Inc. v. Regions BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. Glass ex rel. Knight v. ClarkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Myles v. Screentech, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API