Legal Opinion
Millaud v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1986No. D004472PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
Terry Wynn Millaud, defendant in a criminal prosecution charging homicide, robbery, and other offenses, seeks a writ of mandate to compel pretrial criminal discovery. (Hill v. Superior Court (1974) 10 Cal.3d 812, 816 [112 Cal.Rptr. 257, 518 P.2d 1353, 95 A.L.R.3d 820]; Joe Z. v. Superior Court (1970) 3 Cal.3d 797, 801 [91 Cal.Rptr. 594, 478 P.2d 26].) We have concluded discovery was improperly denied and the writ shall issue.
The charges with which we are concerned arise out of a homicide occurring at an Alpha Beta Supermarket located at 3400 Palm Avenue in San Diego. They…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. HammonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Vela v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Department of Corrections v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.