Legal Opinion
Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Eighmy
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 8, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-2487-GTVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, District Judge.
This case is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion (Doc. 4) to remand the case to the District Court of Doniphan County, Kansas. Plaintiffs’ also seek costs, including reasonable attorney fees, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) for improper removal. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to remand is granted but the request for costs is denied.
I. Background
Plaintiffs filed a petition for declaratory judgment in the District Court of Doniphan County, Kansas, on August 5, 1993. The action arises out of defendants’ claims requesting coverage,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Stevens v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Kellam v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bank IV Salina, N.A. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frederick & Warinner v. LundgrenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Mattel, Inc. v. BryantDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Asten v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Palmquist v. Conseco Medical InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2000
- Wakefield v. OlcottDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.