Legal Opinion
Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 1, 2000No. CV 95-3653(ADS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
In its August 25, 1999 decision, this Court held that an employer being sued for age discrimination, based partly upon the terms of a Collective Bargaining Agreement and a Performance Planning and Evaluation Program (“PP & E”), may seek contribution under the New York Human Rights Law (“NYHRL”) and CPLR 1401 from the union that was a party to those labor agreements. See Rodolico v. Unisys Corp., 189 F.R.D. 245 (E.D.N.Y.1999). As a result of this decision, pursuant to Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ.P.”), the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- International Audiotext Network, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Agosto v. Correctional Officers Benevolent Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- SKS Constructors, Inc. v. DrinkwineDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Bryant v. Verizon Communications Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Langford v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 30District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.