Legal Opinion

Long v. Gorham Corporation

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 5, 1966No. Eq. No. 3285PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This is an original petition for compensation as authorized by the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act, G. L. 1956, §28-33-1. It was heard by a single commissioner who denied and dismissed the petition on the grounds that the petitioner had -failed to establish by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the injury sustained arose out of and in the course of his -employment, was connected therewith and referable thereto. A decree was entered in accordance with such findings and on appeal therefrom the full commission affirmed the decree of the single commissioner. The- petitioner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryerson v. A. E. Bounty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Lima v. William H. Haskell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
  3. Barnes v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coletta v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  2. Seiber v. Moog Automotive, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Dawson v. a & H MFG. CO.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  4. Hebblewaite v. PowersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
  5. Pallotta v. Foxon Packaging Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API