Legal Opinion

Pressler v. Moody

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 27, 1950No. 12145PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Appellant, Frank Pressler, instituted suit against appellees, Wayland P. Moody and his son, Wayland P. Moody II, for damages arising out of an automobile intersection collision and appellee Wayland P. Moody cross-acted. Wayland P. Moody II was driving his father’s automobile at the time of the accident. The jury answered appellant’s affirmative issues adversely to him, and on the cross-action found that appellant failed to keep a proper lookout, failed to yield the right-of-way to the driver of appellee’s car, and that these failures each proximately caused the collision. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. SturgeonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Schuhmacher Co. v. HolcombTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. OrrTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Safety Casualty Co. v. TeetsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Warren Petroleum Corporation v. PyeattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Ragsdale v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Ferris v. StablefordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Maynard v. Dallas Railway & Terminal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Knight v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API