Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1956No. 3243PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Maynard sued the railway company for damages sustained by his wife in a collision with defendant’s bus. Mrs. Maynard had ridden the bus north on Harwood Street ■and alighted at the intersection of Harwood and Ross Avenue preparatory to walking across Ross to its north side when the operator turned the bus to the right and drove partially across the walk which crosses Ross Avenue on Harwood Street when Mrs. Maynard either ran into the bus or the bus struck her. Plaintiff alleged defendant was guilty of the following acts of negligence and that each was a proximate cause…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Pearson v. DohertyTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Blanton v. E. & L. Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Siratt v. Worth Construction CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Dallas Railway & Terminal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Montgomery v. PaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Henry v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Hopkins v. PenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Gamblin v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API