Legal Opinion

Borgwardt v. Redlin

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 8, 1995No. 94-2701PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

This is an appeal from the trial court's non-final order directing Nelson S. Weine, Esq., a non-party deposition witness, to produce documents that the plaintiffs claim are protected by the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine. 1 We reverse.

I

This is an accounting and legal malpractice action. The complaint filed by G. Curt Borgwardt and C & S Graphics alleged, inter alia, that the law firm of M & W, Ltd., and three named attorneys employed by the firm, including Weine, were negligent in connection with the plaintiffs' purchase of another business, which subsequently failed.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Wurtz v. FleischmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lane v. SHARP PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Imposition of Sanctions in Alt v. ClineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Harold Sampson Children's Trust v. Linda Gale Sampson 1979 TrustWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Dilger v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
  5. Fouts v. Breezy Point Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API