Borgwardt v. Redlin
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
This is an appeal from the trial court's non-final order directing Nelson S. Weine, Esq., a non-party deposition witness, to produce documents that the plaintiffs claim are protected by the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine. 1 We reverse.
I
This is an accounting and legal malpractice action. The complaint filed by G. Curt Borgwardt and C & S Graphics alleged, inter alia, that the law firm of M & W, Ltd., and three named attorneys employed by the firm, including Weine, were negligent in connection with the plaintiffs' purchase of another business, which subsequently failed.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wurtz v. FleischmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lane v. SHARP PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Imposition of Sanctions in Alt v. ClineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Harold Sampson Children's Trust v. Linda Gale Sampson 1979 TrustWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Dilger v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
- Fouts v. Breezy Point Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.