Legal Opinion

Amos v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1971No. 45887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

In Georgia no distinction is made between the sale of new and used property. The doctrine of "caveat emptor” applies; agreements for the construction of a house to be placed on the property at the time of purchase are merged in the deed unless expressly exempted therefrom or unless they come under the collateral agreement theory, where the deed contains no express warranty of suitability for the use intended of structures placed thereon, with certain exceptions relating to fraud and misrepresentation not here applicable. Dooly v. Berkner, 113 Ga. App. 162 (147 SE2d 685); Tison v.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whiten v. Orr Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Hunt v. Star Photo Finishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Rawls Bros. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Frank Graham Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Tison v. EskewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gable v. SilverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Holmes v. WortheyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Howell v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. WELDING &C. OF GA. v. SD MULLINS CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Welding Prod. of Ga. v. KunianskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API