Legal Opinion

Frank Graham Co. v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1954No. 35362PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th grounds of demurrer attack the petition on the ground that there is no cause of action, and that it is duplicitous in attempting to join an action in contract with an action in tort. The petition sets out that the automobile was, at the time of its purchase, represented to be in good mechanical condition as to brakes and other items; that on the two occasions when it was returned to the plaintiff after work was done on 'the brakes, it was represented that the brakes had been put in good working condition; that the defendant solicits repair work and holds itself out…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rotche v. Buick Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. City & Suburban Railway v. BraussSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Moody v. Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Ellis v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Speed Oil Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mauldin v. ShefferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. National Chain Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  3. E. & M. Construction Co., Inc. v. BobCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Griffith v. Chevrolet Motor Division of General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. ORKIN TERMITE COMPANY v. DuffellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API