State v. Kelley
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The indictment alleges that the defendant, on, etc., “ at Nashua in the county of Hillsborough aforesaid, with force and arms, in the daytime of the same day, did break and enter the dwelling-house of one Mary Connell there situate, with intent,” etc., and stealing certain goods and chattels specially described. The evidence on the trial was, that the house was situate in Hudson in this county. The defendant objected that the variance was fatal to the indictment.
There are certain crimes and offences which are not local in their nature. The particular place in which they are committed need not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. HoneymanNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Commonwealth v. LaveryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SpadeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- State v. MaguireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Stafford v. HarperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880