Legal Opinion

State v. Fennelly

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 9, 1983No. 81-229PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

The defendant, Robert Fennelly, was charged with receiving stolen property in violation of RSA 637:7. After a jury trial in Superior Court (Goode, J.), the defendant was convicted and sentenced. The defendant has appealed, alleging the commission of a multitude of errors by the trial judge. For the reasons which follow, we affirm the defendant’s conviction, but remand for resentencing.

The theme underlying most of the defendant’s arguments on this appeal is that the trial judge was biased against him and denied him *383his right to a fair trial. The defendant questions numerous rulings made by the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. Peter SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Edward Grady PartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. LinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. State v. BaderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. State v. EricksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API