Legal Opinion

Shipley v. American Central Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 31, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, J.

This in an action upon a policy of automobile fire and theft insurance issued to the complainant below, A. L. Shipley, on November 24, 1934, upon a Stutz automobile. The chancellor decreed a recovery in the sum of $1,500, the maximum amount of coverage provided by the policy. The company has appealed, and insists: (I} That the evidence is insufficient to show that complainant’s automobile was either stolen or accidentally burned; (2) that insured misrepresented the cost price, year model, and motor and serial numbers in. applying* for the policy, all of which were misrepresentations material…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Cooley v. East & West InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gulf Compress Co. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Interstate Life & Accident Co v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  5. Ball v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Third Nat. Bank v. American Equitable Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  2. Farmers Bank & Trust Company of Winchester, Tennessee v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API