Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, Inc. v. Longoria

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided February 1, 1990No. 13-89-316-CVPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

In this original mandamus proceeding, relator, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith requests relief from a trial court order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We conditionally grant the writ in part.

Paul and Pat Van Meter, the real parties in interest, filed suit against Merrill Lynch complaining that Paul Van Meter was wrongfully terminated from his employment with the brokerage firm. Merrill Lynch filed a motion to compel arbitration alleging that Paul Van Meter had completed and executed a Uniform Application for Securities Industry Registration (U-4…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Tenneco Resins, Inc., and Tenn-Uss Chemicals Co. v. Davy International, Ag And/or Davy McKee International, AgCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. In Re Oil Spill by Amoco Cadiz Off Coast of France March 16Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Accelerated Christian Education, Inc. v. Oracle Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  4. Merrill Lynch v. Eddings, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1992
  5. Dallas Cardiology Associates, P.A. v. Mallick, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API