Legal Opinion

United States v. Kahriger

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 18, 1954No. 11098PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

An information of two counts was filed against Kahriger. The first count charged that he engaged in the business of accepting wagers as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 3285, and willfully failed to pay the special occupational tax imposed by 26 U.S.C. § 3290, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 3294 and 2707(b). The second count charged that Kahriger engaged in the business of accepting wagers as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 3285, and willfully failed to register for the special occupational tax relating to wagering as required by 26 U.S.C. §- 3291, in violation of Secs. 3294 and 2707(b). In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. KahrigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Hatfried, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  4. United States v. Martell (Two CasesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. KahrigerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanley Joseph MarkisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. ValentineDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1968
  3. Al Burstein and Violet R. Burstein, Co-Partners Doing Business as Braeburn Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  4. Paul Dillon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  5. Verkouteren v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API